Do i need to pay if i have WIFI connectivity when i make video calls on Galaxy note 2

Q. just bought my note 2 & im overseas. i make video calls thinking that it should be equivalent to facetime of iphones but seems the person (also using samsung model) im calling can see my phone no. does it mean im using my own call time? Thanks

A. If your connected to wifi you dont have to pay

Original Question

Is the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 good for everyday use?

Q. Im worried that it might be too big for everyday use, and will it fit in my pocket?

Thanks :)

A. Its absolutely perfect for your everyday needs. The big display and huge battery will make it good for heavy use as well. And dont worry about pocketing the phone. It will fit you just fine.

Original Question

Why is my Galaxy Note 2 battery draining on standby.?

Q. So before I go to bed my Phone would be 100% When I wake up its around 75-80% I turn the Wifi off and bluetooth also I tone down the brightness. Do you have an app to solve this problem?

A. Have you closed most of your opened apps on your device? Opened apps may drain battery.

Im also wondering, that the battery meter on your phone has gone out of sync with the actual battery power. Here you can find how to fix the problem:

http://budurl.com/FixAndroidProblems

The discussion is for the Kindle Fire, but the same principle will work for any Android devices.

Original Question

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Read More..

Motorola told to pay Rs 60 200 compensation for faulty handset

Mobile handset manufacturer Motorola has been ordered by the district consumer forum to pay a compensation of Rs. 50,000 to a local resident for deficiency in service and unfair commercial practices.

The Thane District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum gave its ruling on a consumer complaint filed against the Gurgaon- based Motorola India Pvt Ltd. The judgement was given by Forum President Umesh Jhavalikar and member N D Kadam Saturday.

The complaint was filed by one Ramesh Shah, a resident of Vasai town in Thane district. Shah purchased a Motorola handset (Moto Ming - A1200) for Rs. 10,200 from a local dealer, Sanghavi Infocom, on April 13, 2008.

The next day Shah found the sound in the handset was feeble. He complained about the same to the dealer, who, however, insisted there was no fault in the mobile piece.

Later, a service centre of Motorola, Siddhivinayak Tele, attended to the complaint and rectified the fault.

However, Shahs woes did not end as he found more problems with the handset, which was finally replaced.

However, the new handset was also found to be faulty.

Finally, the service centre collected the handset on March 21, 2009 from Shah but never returned it.

The company could not resolve the problems which regularly cropped up in the handset, Shah said. Hence, he filed a complaint with the Forum seeking refund of the handset cost and Rs. 1 lakh towards compensation and legal expenses.

Motorola, in its submission, offered to replace the handset and wanted the Forum to dismiss the complaint.

In its order, the Forum made a reference to the same and said the replacement offer points to deficiency in service and unfair commercial practices resorted by the company.

Hence, the company needs to compensate the complainant.

The Forum asked the three respondents to pay a sum of Rs. 60,200 (Rs. 50,000 plus Rs. 10,200 handset cost) to the complainant within a period of 30 days the order.

Read More..